test

OT: Google link?



> If ALL the links are like this /page/IP/PROD/HCR004 it's okay?

yes

>But if
> there are links that are not they need to be standardized?

they should all be the same style

>I have a client
> that asked to use static "doorway" pages - what about those?
>
> Leslie

nope, just the sfl

Jason

>
> >> I don't know. here is an example- is that an SFL link?
> >>
> >>
<A HREF ="http://www.israeliproducts.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?page=IP/PROD/HCR004">http://www.israeliproducts.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?page=IP/PROD/HCR004</A>
> >
> > A bad sfl link, yes. should be israeliproducts.com/page/IP/PROD/HCR004
> >
> >> I have SFL set to "short link". I didn't see an answer to Lori yet-- if
> >> having both SFL and non-SFL is a problem... is this even an issue?
> >
> > Yes. You want one or the other.
> >
> >>I can't
> >> see why SFL and storemap- bought together- wouldn't be made to work
> >> together..?
> >>
> >> Linda Katz
> >> www.israeliproducts.com
> >
> > ?? Huh? They would and do work together.
> >
> > Jason
> >
> >> >> Jason says it's OK to "keep the store map pages but change the
> >> links".
> > If
> >> > I
> >> >> have SFL- do I need to change any links? If so -- how?
> >> >
> >> > depends. Are the links on the sitemap pages SFL links? As I said
> > before,
> >> > download them and search and replace.
> >> >
> >> > Jason
> >>
>
>
>

problem with java in head tag



------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C55A65.0A226470
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello,

I'm trying to insert a simple javascript for my menu into the head tag. I
inserted it, and the menu works and everything, but it gives me a "non-fatal
warning [20005] (line 1/char 1) This string contains opentokens but does not
start with %OUI%".

The only thing that I can tell that is actually wrong with the site is a ">"
inserted at the very top of the page above the global header. like I said,
the menu works, it just has that carrot symbol at the top of the page and it
gives me that error.

Any ideas?

Thanks!

KC

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C55A65.0A226470--

problem with java in head tag



> So this renders Merchant Optimizer worthless?

No. If you have a server load from regular traffic or spider traffic, keep
it.

>And dump static "doorway"
> pages? Use just what Miva Merchant generates? Only have static
> informational pages? What a week to head to NYC - guess I should be a the
> conference that is going on next to the Streaming Media - Google is one of
> teh sponsors there....didn't see FindWhat listed though.

Use one or the other.

Jason


>
> Leslie <-- is ready to freakin scream.
>
>
> > Just wanted to post this after FINALLY hearing back from Google.
> >
> > We had almost 55,000 pages in the Google index from our Search Engine
> > Killer
> > pages, CBS store map pages, plus all the static content pages from the
> > informational side of our site.
> >
> > Now down to 904 and dropping. After quite a few emails to Google, we
> > finally
> > got a response. They are absolutely not indexing ANY form of mirror or
> > HTML
> > equivalent of dynamic pages. If content on pages is identical or even
> > close,
> > forget about it!
> >
> > It's either the dynamic pages, or ONE series of HTML pages. Have a
mirror
> > on
> > another domain? Google may not list your site at all unless (like us),
you
> > also have a fair amount of content pages.
> >
> > They would not get into algorythym specifics, but the bottom line is
that
> > we
> > had too many copies of our store in their index. Their solution was to
get
> > rid OF ALL pages related to Merchant from our site. They said their
spider
> > will now crawl the site starting at the index and will spider any links
it
> > finds until content starts looking identical, then it will stop. It will
> > be
> > at least two to six months after we "clean up our site and remove all
> > forms
> > of mirror html pages before Google will start indexing new html pages
> > generated by our new PHP Frame solution (Sebenza Studios). As that
> > solution
> > also prevents the spider from seeing standard mvc product and category
> > pages, it will work, but only after we get rid of our SEK pages and CBS
> > Store Map.
> >
> > SEK, CBS store map and any other form of mirrored pages are a thing of
the
> > past when it comes to Google. Either the PHP Frame solution we have or
> > Search Friendly links with dynamic Miva pages are the only way to fly.
Get
> > rid of anything else fast!
> >
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Dave Hauser, President
> > Aquarium Professionals Group
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
> > Someone recently posted a link to a story about new changes at Google.
> >
> > I have a client that has found his sales down, and google listing has
> > dropped bu thousands. Did they
> > drop thousands of pages?
> >
> > Anyone have that link?
> >
> > Bill
> >
>
>
>

Change Payment Method Display



A little thing that can be big. I'm using OUISuperMod to customize
checkout pages. I'm using Credit Cards with Simple Validation plus
Checks for payment methods. I would like to change the dropdown list for
payment method to radio buttons and change the default from Check to
Visa and resort the list. Is such a simple thing possible?=20

It amazes me that there are people shopping online who don't know how to
work a dropdown list..... It was confirmed by a phone rep today. Some
customers are getting confused because you have to enter payment method
with shipment method on one page and then enter the credit card number
on another page. I tried moving them together onto one page but didn't
find a way. It seems Merchant depends on the page change to set the
payment method. Has anyone found a way to change this?

A note to Miva:
I bought a number of Copernicus modules in good faith that I could get
basic questions answered in forums and in email. That has disappeared
since you bought Copernicus. Could you let James out of the dungeon long
enough to answer a few questions about his programs?=20

Thanks for any help,
Will Emerson

Google Link/CBS Storemap



> Okay, I would use the robot.txt IF I wanted Google to spider the MO and
> not spider the dynamic stuff? Is it better to have Google spidering MO?
>
> Leslie

It all depends on your situation. If you can optimize merchant pages and
don't have a server load issue, why not use merchant pages?

Jason

>
> If using Merchant Optimizer (calling it MO now because it's shorter)...
> > add
> > a line in your robots.txt file:
> >
> > User-agent: *
> > Disallow: /Merchant2/
> >
> > I have a few others in my robots.txt, but that's because the bottom two
> > are
> > nasty... with the last one sucking up resources every time it visits.
> >
> > Then... in your .htaccess file I have it pointing so that the MO
> > directory. In my case www.sausagesource.com/catalog/index.html is the
> > default index instead of the normal
> > www.sausagesource.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc which is commonplace. In
my
> > .htaccess it starts off with this:
> >
> > Options -Indexes
> > DirectoryIndex /catalog/index.html
> >
> > Marc
> >
> >
> >
> > At 07:35 AM 5/17/2005, you wrote:
> >>So this renders Merchant Optimizer worthless???? And dump static
> >> "doorway"
> >>pages? Use just what Miva Merchant generates? Only have static
> >>informational pages? What a week to head to NYC - guess I should be a
the
> >>conference that is going on next to the Streaming Media - Google is one
> >> of
> >>teh sponsors there....didn't see FindWhat listed though.
> >>
> >>Leslie <-- is ready to freakin scream.
> >
>
>
>

customizing search box



You forgot to tell it which screen to go to.

<input type="hidden" name="screen" value="SRCH">

Ray Yates
<A HREF ="http://www.flyinghands.com">http://www.flyinghands.com</A>


-----Original Message-----

Hello,

I have a question. I created my own search box in our miva store and
duplicated the original form elements:

* action="<priv>/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?"
* added the hidden <input name="Store_Code" value="<priv>"
type="hidden">

Whenever i do a search , it just goes to the homepage as if it's not seeing
a particular variable in the POST to tell it this is a search. Am i missing
something here?


Any help is much appreciated.

- Mike D

--


......................................
Mike Dunlop
Webmaster - AWN, Inc.
[ e ] [email protected]
[ p ] 323.606.4237

AWN.com | AIDB.com | VFXWorld.com

RE: Tim's Lame Email Service



On 5/16/05, mivalist <[email protected]> wrote:
> Tim,
>=20
> Please unsubscribe from the list (or Miva support, please assist with tha=
t)
> until such time as you're willing to not place the burden of insuring you=
r
> privacy on those who are here to help you (for free). The verification
> notices are really getting old.

I fought this fight with another list member today, got nowhere (I think).

Miva can't stop them, as they are sent direct to you after the message
is recieved from the list. That said, it would be great if they'd add
something to the footer...

Please do NOT use SpamArrest (or other similar services) on the
address you use for the lists.
Please do NOT set vacation/away autoresponders on the address you use
for the lists.
=20
> Do you make customers of your store put up with this as well?
>=20
> Dan
> Impulse Creations
>=20
> For low priced back issue comics and the very best in service visit us at
> www.impulsecreations.net <<A HREF ="http://www.impulsecreations.net/> and be sure =">http://www.impulsecreations.net/> and be sure =</A>
to
> look for information on our discounted subscription service with free bag=
s
> and free shipping!
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 8:05 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: RE: [mru] Upsell Process (verification)
>=20
> Tim here,
>=20
> I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail.
>=20
> Just this once, click the link below so I can receive your emails. You wo=
n't
> have to do this again.
>=20
> http://spamarrest.com/a2?ZGp4AmHjZmc...yLKEco25mYz5y=
qQc
> HnJ0j
>=20
> You are receiving this message in response to your email to Tim, a Spam
> Arrest customer.
> Spam Arrest requests that senders verify themselves before their email is
> delivered.
> When you click the above link, you will be taken to a page with a graphic=
on
> it. Simply read the word in the graphic, type it into the form, and you'r=
e
> verified.
> You will only need to do this once per Spam Arrest customer.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Below are the complete headers of the message that this email was generat=
ed
> in response to.
>=20
> Status: U
> Return-Path:
> Received: from listmgr.miva.com ([207.67.195.27])
> by new.mail.atl.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP id
> 1dxQvj3BQ3Nl3oX0
> for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:04:13 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: (qmail 1147 invoked by alias); 17 May 2005 16:18:05 -0000
> Mailing-List: contact [email protected]; run by ezmlm
> X-No-Archive: yes
> List-Post:
> List-Help:
> List-Unsubscribe:
> List-Subscribe:
> Sender: [email protected]
> Delivered-To: mailing list [email protected]
> Received: (qmail 1138 invoked from network); 17 May 2005 16:18:05 -0000
> From: "mivalist"
> To: "Kent" ,
> "Merchant-Users"
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 20:06:01 -0500
> Message-ID:
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset=3D"windows-1250"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
> Importance: Normal
> In-Reply-To: <[email protected] >
> X-SpamBouncer: 1.5 (11/12/02)
> X-SBClass: OK
> Subject: RE: [mru] Upsell Process
> X-ELNK-AV: 0
> X-SA-Poll-Id: 1dxQvj3BQ3Nl3oX0..2..1116291961000
> X-SA-USERIDNR: 1676603
>=20
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Webmasters help stop spam and make 50%.
> http://spamarrest.com/affiliates
> <http://spamarrest.com/affl?1787503/affiliates/index.jsp>
>=20
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.11 - Release Date: 5/16/05
>=20
>=20


--=20
Bill Guindon (aka aGorilla)

Change Payment Method Display



I'm far from an expert on Google so I'm just making an educated guess here
but I know that when I do a Google search I'll sometimes see a listing from
one domain followed by an indention and then a second listing from the same
domain. I don't know under what circumstances Google chooses to do that but
I would have to guess it's due to their algorithm deciding that two pages
from the same domain qualify for the same ranking (based on the search
terms) and would therefore get the #1 & 2 (9&10, 10063 & 10064, etc.)
position but it adds the indention to shows that both listings are from the
same domain.

If we assume that to be the logic, pages on the same domain with duplicate
content would naturally have the same ranking and would always display that
way giving such stores an advantage over their competition.

Again, I don't know if any of this is the case but it's the only thing I can
think of that makes Google's new policy make any sense.

Dan
Impulse Creations

For low priced back issue comics and the very best in service visit us at
www.impulsecreations.net and be sure to look for information on our
discounted subscription service with free bags and free shipping!

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Bruce Golub -
Phosphormedia.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 1:05 PM
To: 'Miva Merchant Users'
Subject: RE: [mru] OT: Google link?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Jason Henderson
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 10:58 AM
> To: Bruce Golub - Phosphormedia.com
> Cc: 'Miva Merchant Users'
> Subject: Re: [mru] OT: Google link?
>
> > Also, I think some are confusing "mirror" sites with
> "mirror" pages.
> > I'm
> not
> > certain, but pretty sure that Google, or any search engine for that
> matter,
> > does not penelize for duplicate "pages" under the same
> domain...that
> > would just be silly. What they are penalizing are duplicate pages,
> > under
> different
> > domains. For example, www.ThisIsTheRealSite.com/rankme.html being
> > exactly the same as www.ThisIsAnotherSite.com/rankthis.html.
>
> Bruce,
>
> Did you miss Dave's post yesterday? Google indeed is now
> penalizing for duplicate content on the same domain.
>
> Jason

I didn't have time to read the article, however, if they are doing this,
then I'm selling my shares in Google, cause it shows they are just being
stupid. There is no benefit from having duplicate content under the same
domain, so why invoke a penelty.

-Bruce

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.12 - Release Date: 5/17/2005

problem with java in head tag



That's what I figured since it worked.

I still don't understand the ">" at the top of the page though. it has
something to do with the body tag. I inserted it like I normally would, and
the carrot(sp?) appears. The only character like that in the body is the
closing ">", so I deleted it, updated it, and it got rid of it on the page.
I don't understand. It still works without the closing ">". I don't
understand why it's there in the first place, how deleting the closing ">"
fixed it, and how my rollovers still work with an unclosed onload tag....

any explaination you can think of?

thanks!

KC
-----Original Message-----
From: mivalist [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 10:32 PM
To: Patio & Grill; miva list
Subject: RE: [mru] problem with java in head tag


That's an OUI error message. It means that your code "appears" to be using
opentokens but you didn't make %OUI% the first five characters in the box
for that code. Assuming you're not actually using opentokens in that code
you can just disregard the message. If you are using opentokens then you
need to insert the %OUI% bit but, if that were the case, something wouldn't
be working because those opentokens wouldn't be getting parsed. Therefore,
you most likely just have something in there that looks like opentokens but
isn't so don't worry.

Dan
Impulse Creations

For low priced back issue comics and the very best in service visit us at
www.impulsecreations.net and be sure to look for information on our
discounted subscription service with free bags and free shipping!

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Patio & Grill
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 10:17 PM
To: miva list
Subject: [mru] problem with java in head tag

Hello,

I'm trying to insert a simple javascript for my menu into the head tag. I
inserted it, and the menu works and everything, but it gives me a "non-fatal
warning [20005] (line 1/char 1) This string contains opentokens but does not
start with %OUI%".

The only thing that I can tell that is actually wrong with the site is a ">"
inserted at the very top of the page above the global header. like I said,
the menu works, it just has that carrot symbol at the top of the page and it
gives me that error.

Any ideas?

Thanks!

KC

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.11 - Release Date: 5/16/05

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.11 - Release Date: 5/16/05

Google Link/CBS Storemap



Hey Don,

You could use OpenLanguages but might not be good if you use storeman. You
can recreate the login screen with OpenUI. Here is how
<A HREF ="http://www.jmhonline.net/miva-help/login+screen">http://www.jmhonline.net/miva-help/login+screen</A>

Jason


> Log In text customization!
>
> Some of my customers are having trouble creating an account at my store.
> They don't seem to realize they need to enter a user specified user name
> in the "Log In" create account form. I would like to change this to say
> "User Name" instead of Log In, but can't seem to find where I can do
> this. I am using the latest OpenUI with Miva 4.24.
>
> Thanks
> Don
>
>

Google Link/CBS Storemap



I did some testing today and found some of our results containing the
sek url as the indented item, but then just as I did figured that would
be consistent; the SFL styles can in as indented. Continuing my not so
scientific analysis it looks as though some of our results that I'm
pretty sure that used have indented sek urls are now single SFL results.
Today I disallowd on the sek directory since our SFL links out number
the SEk results by 4 to 1 - hope I am heading off trouble and not in to
it.
Should be ok I think as it is in keeping with what google is really
trying to do.

For now we'll just live with the slow down when the spider feeds.
I'm not about to completely change horses in midstream at this point.

Thanks,
-Barrett
http://handmade-paper.us
Hosted by Hostasaurus.com (MM v4.20 OUI)
ShipWorks by Interapptive.com




On Tuesday, May 17, 2005, at 02:26 PM, mivalist wrote:

> I'm far from an expert on Google so I'm just making an educated guess
> here
> but I know that when I do a Google search I'll sometimes see a listing
> from
> one domain followed by an indention and then a second listing from the
> same
> domain. I don't know under what circumstances Google chooses to do
> that but
> I would have to guess it's due to their algorithm deciding that two
> pages
> from the same domain qualify for the same ranking (based on the search
> terms) and would therefore get the #1 & 2 (9&10, 10063 & 10064, etc.)
> position but it adds the indention to shows that both listings are
> from the
> same domain.
>
> If we assume that to be the logic, pages on the same domain with
> duplicate
> content would naturally have the same ranking and would always display
> that
> way giving such stores an advantage over their competition.
>
> Again, I don't know if any of this is the case but it's the only thing
> I can
> think of that makes Google's new policy make any sense.
>
> Dan
> Impulse Creations
>
> For low priced back issue comics and the very best in service visit us
> at
> www.impulsecreations.net and be sure to look for information on our
> discounted subscription service with free bags and free shipping!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Bruce Golub
> -
> Phosphormedia.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 1:05 PM
> To: 'Miva Merchant Users'
> Subject: RE: [mru] OT: Google link?
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> Jason Henderson
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 10:58 AM
>> To: Bruce Golub - Phosphormedia.com
>> Cc: 'Miva Merchant Users'
>> Subject: Re: [mru] OT: Google link?
>>
>>> Also, I think some are confusing "mirror" sites with
>> "mirror" pages.
>>> I'm
>> not
>>> certain, but pretty sure that Google, or any search engine for that
>> matter,
>>> does not penelize for duplicate "pages" under the same
>> domain...that
>>> would just be silly. What they are penalizing are duplicate pages,
>>> under
>> different
>>> domains. For example, www.ThisIsTheRealSite.com/rankme.html being
>>> exactly the same as www.ThisIsAnotherSite.com/rankthis.html.
>>
>> Bruce,
>>
>> Did you miss Dave's post yesterday? Google indeed is now
>> penalizing for duplicate content on the same domain.
>>
>> Jason
>
> I didn't have time to read the article, however, if they are doing
> this,
> then I'm selling my shares in Google, cause it shows they are just
> being
> stupid. There is no benefit from having duplicate content under the
> same
> domain, so why invoke a penelty.
>
> -Bruce
>

RE: Tim's Lame Email Service



I'd go that route, but unfortunately, clients/friends/family may use
this 'service' too.

I have no problem with using it on personal email addresses, but don't
use it on a an address you use for lists. That's what yahoo/gmail are
for (btw, gmail is great for lists - and it has excellent spam
filtering. If you want a gmail invite, just ask).

On 5/16/05, Chuck Lasker - DoublePlus <[email protected]> wrote:
> I just block all e-mails from anyone who does this. If they don't want my
> e-mails without confirming, I don't want their e-mails at all.
>=20
> Chuck
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> > Bill Guindon
> > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 10:41 PM
> > To: mivalist
> > Cc: Merchant Users; Miva User Group Support
> > Subject: Re: [mru] RE: Tim's Lame Email Service
> >
> > On 5/16/05, mivalist <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Tim,
> > >
> > > Please unsubscribe from the list (or Miva support, please
> > assist with that)
> > > until such time as you're willing to not place the burden
> > of insuring your
> > > privacy on those who are here to help you (for free). The
> > verification
> > > notices are really getting old.
> >
> > I fought this fight with another list member today, got
> > nowhere (I think).
> >
> > Miva can't stop them, as they are sent direct to you after the message
> > is recieved from the list. That said, it would be great if they'd add
> > something to the footer...
> >
> > Please do NOT use SpamArrest (or other similar services) on the
> > address you use for the lists.
> > Please do NOT set vacation/away autoresponders on the address you use
> > for the lists.
> >
> > > Do you make customers of your store put up with this as well?
> > >
> > > Dan
> > > Impulse Creations
> > >
> > > For low priced back issue comics and the very best in
> > service visit us at
> > > www.impulsecreations.net <<A HREF ="http://www.impulsecreations.net/>">http://www.impulsecreations.net/></A>
> > and be sure to
> > > look for information on our discounted subscription service
> > with free bags
> > > and free shipping!
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tim [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 8:05 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: RE: RE: [mru] Upsell Process (verification)
> > >
> > > Tim here,
> > >
> > > I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail.
> > >
> > > Just this once, click the link below so I can receive your
> > emails. You won't
> > > have to do this again.
> > >
> > >
> > http://spamarrest.com/a2?ZGp4AmHjZmc...coKO1oUAyL3WyL
> KEco25mYz5yqQc
> > > HnJ0j
> > >
> > > You are receiving this message in response to your email to
> > Tim, a Spam
> > > Arrest customer.
> > > Spam Arrest requests that senders verify themselves before
> > their email is
> > > delivered.
> > > When you click the above link, you will be taken to a page
> > with a graphic on
> > > it. Simply read the word in the graphic, type it into the
> > form, and you're
> > > verified.
> > > You will only need to do this once per Spam Arrest customer.
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Below are the complete headers of the message that this
> > email was generated
> > > in response to.
> > >
> > > Status: U
> > > Return-Path:
> > > Received: from listmgr.miva.com ([207.67.195.27])
> > > by new.mail.atl.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server)
> > with SMTP id
> > > 1dxQvj3BQ3Nl3oX0
> > > for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:04:13 -0400 (EDT)
> > > Received: (qmail 1147 invoked by alias); 17 May 2005 16:18:05 -0000
> > > Mailing-List: contact [email protected];
> > run by ezmlm
> > > X-No-Archive: yes
> > > List-Post:
> > > List-Help:
> > > List-Unsubscribe:
> > > List-Subscribe:
> > > Sender: [email protected]
> > > Delivered-To: mailing list [email protected]
> > > Received: (qmail 1138 invoked from network); 17 May 2005
> > 16:18:05 -0000
> > > From: "mivalist"
> > > To: "Kent" ,
> > > "Merchant-Users"
> > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 20:06:01 -0500
> > > Message-ID:
> > > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > > charset=3D"windows-1250"
> > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
> > > X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
> > > Importance: Normal
> > > In-Reply-To: <[email protected] >
> > > X-SpamBouncer: 1.5 (11/12/02)
> > > X-SBClass: OK
> > > Subject: RE: [mru] Upsell Process
> > > X-ELNK-AV: 0
> > > X-SA-Poll-Id: 1dxQvj3BQ3Nl3oX0..2..1116291961000
> > > X-SA-USERIDNR: 1676603
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Webmasters help stop spam and make 50%.
> > > http://spamarrest.com/affiliates
> > > <http://spamarrest.com/affl?1787503/affiliates/index.jsp>
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.11 - Release Date: 5/16/05
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bill Guindon (aka aGorilla)
> >
> >

RE: Tim's Lame Email Service



ahhhh. not that was nice and easy. Thanks so much Bruce for the BIG help!
Works great now!!!!

Craig L.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Bruce Golub -
Phosphormedia.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 2:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mru] static search form question


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Visual Reality
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 12:00 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [mru] static search form question
>
> Question.... I am using Viking Coders Search Manager and I am
> trying to add a static one line search box (using the code
> from their documentation) on my home page. However, when I
> paste the code into the table I am using it messes up the
> table and throws everything off, even though there is plenty
> of room there. Any idea of how to constrain this thing so it
> fits correctly?

Yea, I bet if you add:

Style="display:inline" to the form tag, i.e., <form Style="display:inline"
Method=....>

It will clear up the problem

-Bruce Golub
PHOSPHOR Media
......................................
Featuring: StoreMan - A smarter way to manage Miva Merchant(tm) Store
Content.
Download a hassle-free demo today
<A HREF ="http://www.phosphormedia.com/go.mv?ID=listsm">http://www.phosphormedia.com/go.mv?ID=listsm</A>
......................................

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.12 - Release Date: 5/17/2005

Google Link/CBS Storemap



How do you get a "good" SFL link??

Was there an upgrade to SFL or storemap that does better? Why wouldn't
storemap write "good" ones if they work together?

So if we have to go in and change all the llnks on the html pages-- should
the category pages look like this?

<A HREF ="http://www.israeliproducts.com/page=IP/CTGY/Ahava">http://www.israeliproducts.com/page=IP/CTGY/Ahava</A>

instead of:

<A HREF ="http://www.israeliproducts.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?page=IP/CTGY/Ahava">http://www.israeliproducts.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?page=IP/CTGY/Ahava</A>

In other words... search and replace:

Merchant2/merchant.mvc?

That's always OK to do?
(Then how come merchant isn't programmed that way to begin with? Is that a
ridiculous question?)


Linda Katz
israeliproducts.com

>> I don't know. here is an example- is that an SFL link?
>>
>> <A HREF ="http://www.israeliproducts.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?page=IP/PROD/HCR004">http://www.israeliproducts.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?page=IP/PROD/HCR004</A>
>
> A bad sfl link, yes. should be israeliproducts.com/page/IP/PROD/HCR004

OT: checkout this out



The effect they use is specific to Internet Explorers JavaScript
implementation.

document.images.productImg.style.filter="blendTran s(duration=1)

Google "blendTrans" an you will find the MS website detailing its use.
Basically one image is cross fading into the other.

Ray Yates
<A HREF ="http://www.flyinghands.com">http://www.flyinghands.com</A>


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck Lasker -
DoublePlus
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 12:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [mru] OT: checkout this out


Check out the way the image changes when you select different colors in the
drop down list. Pretty cool. I'll bet something could be done similar with
PhosphorMedia's attribute module...

<A HREF ="http://www.sharperimage.com/us/en/catalog/productview/sku=SI737SNX/hppos=19">http://www.sharperimage.com/us/en/catalog/productview/sku=SI737SNX/hppos=19</A>

Chuck Lasker
DoublePlus New Media Marketing
[email protected]